Effects of Video-Based Feedback Instruction on Tactical Learning, Interest, and Self-Efficacy in Handball Education

Authors

  • Montassar Ben Romdhan Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, Sfax University, Sfax, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9412-5097
  • Mohamed Sami Bouzid Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar-Said, Manouba University, Tunis, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5835-8609
  • Ghazi Racil Research Unit (LR23JS01) “Sport Performance, Health & Society”, Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Saïd, University of Manouba, Tunis 2010, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-7026
  • Khaled Trabelsi Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, Sfax University, Sfax, Tunisia
  • Ionel Melenco Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Ovidius University of Constanta, 900470 Constanta, Romania https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8087-4837
  • Johnny Padulo Università degli Studi di Milano https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4254-3105

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51371/issn.1840-2976.616

Keywords:

Physical Education, Video Feedback, Tactical Learning, Motor Skills, Team Sport

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the impact of video use in three different formats: continuous playback without interruption,
self-paced control, and feedback-based format, on situational interest, self-efficacy, and the development of tactical knowledge
in handball among students in physical education.
Methods: Sixty secondary school students, (age 14.47±0.44 years) were divided into three groups of 20 students each, with
10 girls and 10 boys per group: The Continuous Video Group (CVG; n=20), the Video Control Group (CTR; n= 20), and the
Video Feedback Group (VFB; n=20). Students viewed a handball video scenario and then completed recall and transfer tests,
as well as situational interest and self-efficacy questionnaires.
Results: Non-parametric analyses (Mann-Whitney U tests) showed that the Video Control Group had significantly better
recall than the Video Continuous (U= 52, P< .001) and Video Feedback groups (U= 71.5, P< .001). For transfer and efficacy
tests, both the Control and Feedback groups outperformed the Continuous group (transfer: U=4 7, P< .001; U= 73, P< .001;
efficacy: U=118.5, P= .026; U= 110, P= .014). Situational interest was significantly higher in the Continuous group compared
to the Feedback group (P= .027), suggesting continuous video exposure elicits greater interest than delayed feedback.
Conclusions: These results suggest that, although the continuous reading group demonstrated higher situational interest, their
memorization and transfer performance was lower than that of the groups using video control or video feedback. Therefore,
video control and video feedback appear to promote both self-efficacy and performance. Therefore, to optimize results, the use
of these teaching tools should be progressively structured and adapted to the cognitive abilities of physical education students.

Additional Files

Published

01-12-2025

How to Cite

Ben Romdhan, M., Sami Bouzid, M., Racil, G., Trabelsi, K., Melenco, I., & Padulo, J. (2025). Effects of Video-Based Feedback Instruction on Tactical Learning, Interest, and Self-Efficacy in Handball Education. Acta Kinesiologica, 20(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.51371/issn.1840-2976.616

Issue

Section

Original Scientific Article